MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Saturday, 16 November 2024

Amitabh Bachchan's name, voice and picture cannot be used without due permission: Delhi High Court

The court's order came on a lawsuit by the veteran actor alleging exploitation of his 'publicity rights as a celebrity' by several individuals

PTI New Delhi Published 25.11.22, 11:40 AM
Amitabh Bachchan

Amitabh Bachchan File picture

The Delhi High Court on Friday passed an interim order restraining unauthorised use of actor Amitabh Bachchan's voice, image, name or any other trait exclusively identifiable with him by any individual.

The court's order came on a lawsuit by the veteran actor alleging exploitation of his "publicity rights as a celebrity" by several individuals, including the person behind a "KBC lottery" to scam the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 80-year-old Bachchan is the host of popular TV game show Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC).

Justice Navin Chawla said it is undisputed that Bachchan is a well-known personality and is likely to suffer an irreparable loss and disrepute if relief is not granted at this stage.

Opining that a case for relief at this stage has been made out by the actor, the court ordered, "There shall be an ad interim ex parte order of injunction".

"The defendants appear to be using his celebrity status for promoting their own activities without his authorisation or permission. The plaintiff is therefore likely to suffer grave irreparable harm or injury to his reputation. In fact, some of the activities complained of may also bring disrepute," the court said.

The court directed telecom authorities to take action to pull down websites providing the content in violation of Bachchan's rights.

It also directed telecom service providers to block access to telephone numbers circulating infringing messages.

Senior advocate Harish Salve, who appeared on behalf of the actor, said the relief of injunction was sought not only against the individuals named in the lawsuit but also against "john doe" parties or unknown parties who may be exploiting Bachchan's publicity rights.

Advocates Ameet Naik and Pravin Anand also appeared for Bachchan before the high court.

Salve argued that besides the lottery, domain names were registered under the actor's name; there was "Amitabh Bachchan Video Call" service and even T-shirts bearing his photographs.

In his lawsuit, Bachchan has asserted that only he exercises the "control over commercial utilisation of his personality, name, voice, image, likeness and other characteristics that are uniquely identifiable and associated" with him and no one can "utilise", "misappropriate" or "imitate" any facet of his personality or "exploit the same commercially" without his consent or express authorisation.

The elements of plaintiff's persona have a huge commercial value associated with them and any third party found using any of them is bound to cause confusion and deception amongst the general public, asserted the lawsuit which has sought Rs 2 crore from the defendants as damages.

It has informed that one of the defendants is allegedly circulating messages on WhatsApp with the actor's image to promote "KBC lotteries", which scams the public into believing that 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' was offering lottery prizes to the general public.

Another defendant, the plea adds, is selling a general knowledge quiz book with Bachchan's image for aspirants who wish to participate in the television quiz show.

In his plea seeking interim relief, Bachchan has said that due to his goodwill and reputation, he is "one of the most sought-after celebrities for brand endorsements" and to protect the same, he "ensures that he endorses a product only after carrying out a thorough background check of the brand, its perception in the minds of the public and other relevant factors".

"The present suit is being filed to protect the plaintiff's name, voice, image, likeness, and all other elements of the plaintiff's persona which are distinctive and the unauthorised use of which by third parties is likely to create confusion and deception amongst the public," it has further said.

The matter would be heard next in March.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT