Is it a mere coincidence that strongmen — synonymous with an authoritarian style of governance — are at the helm of nations weakened by such leadership? The clout of the United States of America under Donald Trump, it can be argued, has been reduced significantly in the geo-strategic context. Another democracy — it has a prime minister with the metaphorical 56-inch chest — seems to be struggling too. Narendra Modi’s India is battling multiple challenges, ranging from a marauding pandemic, diplomatic alienation in the neighbourhood as well as rising tension on the borders with a giant neighbour. Each of these problems, the Opposition alleges, can be attributed to the myopic vision of the prime minister. It would not be easy for Mr Modi to deflect such a charge. But a narrow vision would only offer a partial explanation of India’s present woes. Another significant problem, as pointed out by the Congress leader, Rahul Gandhi, lies in the dichotomy between Mr Modi’s carefully constructed image of a bold, decisive leader and the rather alarming ground reality. In a telling analysis of the Chinese incursion, Mr Gandhi has pointed out that the infiltration cannot be attributed to the unresolved issues on the border only. China’s aggression, in Mr Gandhi’s opinion, must be seen in the light of the immiserization of India’s diplomatic relations as well as its economy. The weaknesses in these spheres — they once formed the bulwark of protection for the country — may have emboldened China to indulge in mischief. What is worse is Mr Modi seems incapable of finding a way out of the mess. That is because the prime minister’s political survival depends on sustaining his credentials as a strong leader. An admission of truth, even though the lapses are quite evident, would lead to the dismantling of the myth of the strongman. Perhaps that is why Mr Modi, unlike the rest of the country, cannot spot an incursion even when there is one.
But it must be admitted that Mr Modi has left a bold imprint of his leadership in several other spheres. Any criticism of the government, be it by political opponents or the common man, is met with unprecedented antagonism: a leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party has made the astounding claim that Mr Gandhi takes his briefs from China. The vilification of those who retain the courage to ask the searching questions is consistent with the BJP’s tactic when cornered. The consequent stifling of truth — the other legacy of strong leaders — is inimical to democracy and nation.