MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
Regular-article-logo Monday, 25 November 2024

Twitter befuddled by #ICCRules that gave England the World Cup

The hosts were crowned the world champions on the basis of the number of boundaries they had hit

The Telegraph Published 15.07.19, 09:11 AM

(AP photo)

An over-the-moon England team was crowned the world champions for the first time in the history of men’s cricket after they beat a competitive New Zealand side in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 final on Sunday at the historic Lord’s cricket ground.

However, the match result does not tell the entire story. Much to its dismay, New Zealand discovered that fine margins matter — and how! The Black Caps put up a score of 241/8 in their allotted 50 overs. England, too, reached that score but not before losing all its wickets.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then came the Super Over. England, having posted a total of 15 runs in the critical over, must have thought it had an advantage over New Zealand. But, much to the chagrin of the English, New Zealand also reached that score.

The hosts were, however, crowned the world champions on the basis of the number of boundaries they had hit: 26, compared to New Zealand’s 17.

The decision was taken in accordance with a bizarre International Cricket Council (ICC) rule. Some experts felt that there should not have been a winner at all and the trophy should have been shared between the Kiwis and the English.

Let alone common cricket fans… even cricketers and broadcasters were befuddled by the outcome of the match.

ICC drew flak for the rule that decided the match in England’s favour. However, there was no word from cricket’s governing body if it plans to change the rule after the backlash. Instead, ICC was celebrating England’s win on Twitter:

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT