MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Monday, 23 December 2024

Liverpool and Arsenal fans protest against club owners

“£nough is £nough FSG Out” and “Henry, You have blood on your hands,” were the words on some of the banners, referencing Fenway Sports Group and principal owner John Henry

AP/PTI Liverpool Published 25.04.21, 02:35 AM
Arsenal fans protest against owner Stan Kroenke’s involvement in the failed launch of the European Super League in front of the Emirates Stadium on Friday.

Arsenal fans protest against owner Stan Kroenke’s involvement in the failed launch of the European Super League in front of the Emirates Stadium on Friday. Twitter / @brfootball

Banners bearing slogans calling for the removal of Liverpool’s American ownership were on view outside Anfield before the team’s Premier League match against Newcastle as English fans continued to show their dissatisfaction about the aborted Super League project on Saturday.

The protests on Anfield Road were muted compared to those by several hundred Arsenal fans outside Emirates Stadium on Friday ahead of their game against Everton. The sentiments were similar, however, with club owners the targets of criticism.

ADVERTISEMENT

“£nough is £nough FSG Out” and “Henry, You have blood on your hands,” were the words on some of the banners, referencing Fenway Sports Group and principal owner John Henry.

There were around 150 Liverpool fans outside the stadium and they greeted the players and management with warm applause as the team bus arrived at Anfield. That highlighted the separation supporters were making between the owners of England’s so-called “Big Six” clubs who were behind the Super League, and the rest of the club.

“The part I have struggled with is seeing this club, a place I love and am now proud to call my home, trashed — and done so in a manner which suggests no redemption is possible. That I can’t take,” Klopp said in his notes in the matchday programme.

“It was right to take apart the concept and it was fair to criticise it, along with those who came up with it and also how it was presented. All legitimate in my view.

“The anger and disappointment was justified but there were times when the distinction between club’ and this decision (and yes, those responsible for it) were too quickly blurred into one.”

A statement published on Friday by Chelsea expressed “regret” at members of its hierarchy getting involved in the Super League proposals, though there was no apology.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT