MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Monday, 23 December 2024

Tropes and Isotopes

What was Stonehenge for? The answer, courtesy a study of ancient DNA, might be simpler than you thought

Farah Nayeri Published 22.07.24, 05:40 AM
istock.com/janine lamontagne

istock.com/janine lamontagne

Myriad theories have proliferated around Stonehenge, a prehistoric megalithic structure, constructed some 4,500 years ago in Wiltshire, England.While it was built at roughly the same time as the Sphinx and the Great Pyramid of Giza, we know far more about those Egyptian sites. Incomplete knowledge of Stonehenge has turned it into a riddle that is now part of its identity.

Some believe it to be an astronomical calculator, an observatory that helped demarcate the seasons. Others view Stonehenge as a place of healing, a kind of prehistoric Lourdes, which hosted hordes of pilgrims. In the 1960s and 1970s, the site was thought to be imbued with magical and mystical powers, and it became a hot spot for hippies and open-air festivals. Today, it’s a focal point of New Age counterculture and environmental activism. Stonehenge also attracts plenty of alien-origin theories.

ADVERTISEMENT

As archaeologist and writer Jacquetta Hawkes famously observed in 1967, “Every age has the Stonehenge it deserves — or desires.” Her words are reproduced on a wall text inside a new exhibition at the British Museum, “The World of Stonehenge”. The show strives to lessen the mystery around the monument by focusing on recent discoveries and putting them in the context of life in Britain, Ireland and northwestern Europe before, during and after Stonehenge’s construction.

“Stonehenge was an important place that people went to, to be together as a community,” said Neil Wilkin, the exhibition’s lead curator. He described the site as a mix between a town hall and a cathedral, where people mingled for both religious and social reasons.

The exhibition starts out by introducing visitors to a structure that preceded Stonehenge: a stone circle built on the same spot some 500 years earlier, which, according to archaeologists, was a cemetery. It was constructed with large bluestone pillars — each of them transported from Wales, more than 200 miles away — and used for burying cremated bodies. So far, the remains of 150-200 men, women and children have been found there.

A piece of bluestone most likely used in the building of that cemetery is on display at the British Museum, as are some contents of the 5,000-year-old graves, including bone pins used for fastening shrouds.

Five centuries later, Stonehenge as we know it was built using some of those existing bluestones, as well as more than 80 towering “sarsen” stones — the monument’s vertical pillars — and horizontal lintels, or capping stones. The sarsen stones were pounded into shape by circular hammerstones, several examples of which were recently discovered and are on show in an exhibition vitrine. Each sarsen stone needed at least 1,000 people to transport it over a distance of 15 miles. The process took generations, and many were killed and maimed, according to the exhibition wall text.

Another recent discovery revealed that some of the pilgrims who helped build Stonehenge stayed at Durrington Walls, a nearby settlement that, at its peak, contained around 1,000 temporary houses. A display case in the exhibition — piled high with pig bones and pieces of flint and pottery — attests to the hustle and bustle of that settlement.

Built on the site of an ancient cemetery, Stonehenge was a “monument of remembrance”, said Mike Parker Pearson, a professor at University College London, UK, who has made major Stonehenge-related discoveries, including the Durrington Walls settlement. Yet, he said, “People don’t want it to be that simple as an explanation.”

“I was once told by a government minister that it was a great shame, what we were doing, because, of course, we were chipping away at the mystery,” and “that does terrible things to the visitor numbers,” Parker Pearson added.

Much of that mystery comes down to the fact that writing did not exist in England until the Romans arrived some 2,500 years later — so there is no written history
of Stonehenge and the people who put it up, Parker Pearson said.

Nor did the people of prehistoric England leave any representations of human figures, said Wilkin, the lead curator of the exhibition.

Technology, however, may soon help solve some of the mysteries.

Analysis of stable iso- topes — meaning atoms that have additional or missing neutrons — is being used to study bones, tooth enamel and food residues on pots and elsewhere to determine what a person of that time ate and how far they moved around. Tooth enamel contains a kind of chemical record of the climatic and
geological conditions in which a person grew up, allowing archaeologists to work out how far people travelled from their birthplaces and to map out migration and mobility, Wilkin explained. It also gives insight into their diets.

The study of aDNA, or ancient DNA, is also pinpointing genetic relationships between individuals. Two people buried together with similar-looking ceramic objects might now be identified as brother and sister, with those grave goods taking on extra significance as they start to denote family relationships.

“That’s going to really change the knowledge of the people who built monuments like Stonehenge and what we can say about them,” Wilkin said, adding that it could lead to revising the label of the Stonehenge period from prehistory to “protohistory” — or just to plain history.

New technology could “change how we interpret the objects in a really important way”, Wilkin said. “Exhibitions like this in 10 or 20 years will be very, very different.”

NYTNS

RELATED TOPICS

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT