A Hindu party on Thursday sought action from the Bar Council against senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing Muslim litigants in the Ayodhya land dispute case, for his 'highly unethical act' of tearing the pictorial map that purportedly showed the birthplace of deity Ram during the Supreme Court hearing in the case on Wednesday.

One of the factions of the All India Hindu Mahasabha (AIHM) wrote to the Bar Council of India condemning Dhavan's action on the concluding day of the 40-day hearing in the Ram-Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case before a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

Dhavan had created a flutter in the packed courtroom on Wednesday when he tore the pictorial map provided by senior lawyer Vikas Singh, representing AIHM.

'Rajeev Dhavan, senior advocate of the Supreme Court of India, has committed a highly unethical act by tearing into pieces a copy of the map submitted before the Supreme Court... This act of Dhavan scandals and brings disrepute to the Supreme Court Bar,' Pramod Pandit Joshi, national spokesperson of AIHM said in a statement.

'It is therefore, requested to take cognisance and take appropriate action against the senior advocate in accordance with law,' the statement read.

The apex court on Wednesday wrapped up the marathon hearings in the politically-sensitive case and reserved its verdict.

Dhavan, representing Sunni Waqf Board and other Muslim parties, had taken strong objection to Singh relying on the site map and books written by foreign and Indian authors to buttress claims that the central dome of the now-demolished structure was the birthplace of deity Ram.

Dhavan had said such documents (maps) cannot be relied upon in the matter now as the issue of location of 'janmsthan' was discussed by the Allahabad High Court on other documents.

When he vigorously raised objections to the reliance on the pictorial map, which is also part of the book Ayodhya Revisited by former Bihar cadre IPS officer Kishore Kunal, Singh said he will press the pictorial map to be not taken on record.

Dhavan then asked the Constitution bench as to what he should do with the map.

The bench replied that he can shred the documents into pieces.

Dhavan then tore the pictorial map, provided by the AIHM counsel, in the courtroom to the utter shock of the lawyers and visitors in the packed courtroom.

The drama did not end there and during the hearing in the post lunch session, Dhavan again referred to the pre-lunch incident of his tearing off the papers and said that 'outside the court, it has become viral'.

'The news that has become viral is that I on my own tore the papers,' he said.

Dhavan said he had asked and sought the permission of the bench whether those papers can be thrown out and the reply from the CJI was 'if it is irrelevant, you can tear it'.

'The CJI said I could shred the papers and I just followed the order. I take advice of Mr (Arvind) Datar in such matters and he told me it was a mandamus (a kind of writ or direction),' Dhavan had said.

The CJI replied, 'Dr Dhavan is right that the chief justice said, so he tore up. Let this clarification also be widely reported.'

The CJI was joined by another member of the bench, Justice S. A. Nazeer, who said: 'It is widely reported now.'

When Singh was advancing arguments, the repeated interruptions irked the bench and that led the CJI to observe: 'For us the argument is well over.'