MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
Regular-article-logo Sunday, 24 November 2024

Hardik Patel moves Supreme Court challenging Gujarat HC order rejecting to stay his conviction in riot case

The high court in August 2018 suspended the sentence but not the conviction

PTI New Delhi Published 01.04.19, 12:03 PM
Hardik Patel, 25, had started preparations to contest from Jamnagar on a Congress ticket after joining the party on March 12.

Hardik Patel, 25, had started preparations to contest from Jamnagar on a Congress ticket after joining the party on March 12. PTI

Congress leader Hardik Patel on Monday moved the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat High Court order rejecting his plea to stay his conviction in the 2015 Vispur rioting case.

His petition is likely to be mentioned on Tuesday for urgent hearing and his lawyers would seek stay of the March 29 order of the High Court which is coming in the way of his contesting the Lok Sabha election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Patel, 25, had started preparations to contest from Jamnagar on a Congress ticket after joining the party on March 12 and the last date for filing of nominations is April 4.

Polling for 26 Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat will be held on April 23.

The Sessions Court at Visnagar in Mehsana district sentenced Patel to two years' imprisonment last July for rioting and arson in Visnagar town in 2015 during the Patidar quota stir which he led.

The high court in August 2018 suspended the sentence but not the conviction.

Under the Election Law -- Representation of the People Act and a related Supreme Court ruling -- a convict facing a jail term of two years or more cannot stand for election unless the conviction is stayed.

In the high court, the state government had submitted that there were 17 FIRs including two sedition complaints against Patel who is known for making inflammatory speeches.

The high court had declined the contention of Patel's lawyers that if the conviction was not stayed, it will cause “irreparable damage” as he intended to contest the Lok Sabha election.

In the order, the high court noted that a conviction can be stayed only in rare and exceptional cases, and the case did not fall into that category.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT