MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Saturday, 23 November 2024

Excise policy case: SC questions ED over delay in probe, asks for case files before Arvind Kejriwal's arrest

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta also asked the ED to produce case files before and after the arrest of Delhi's former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia

PTI New Delhi Published 07.05.24, 12:30 PM
Arvind Kejriwal

Arvind Kejriwal File photo

  • SC says if interim bail is granted, Kejriwal cannot function as CM. The court suggested that Kejriwal's continued presence in office could have a "cascading effect" on various matters, reports The Indian Express
  • Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal tells SC he will not deal with any excise policy scam related files, if granted interim bail.
  • If you perform official duties, then it will be conflict of interest and we don't want that: SC to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal
  • We don't want you to be performing official duties if you are granted interim bail: SC to Delhi CM
  • Arvind Kejriwal would not have been arrested had he cooperated in investigation, evaded nine summons: ED to Supreme Court
  • ED opposes SC's view on hearing on interim bail for Arvind Kejriwal, says court may not create separate class for politicians
  • It is an extraordinary situation as Arvind Kejriwal is CM, need to consider his interim bail: SC to ED
  • Will hear arguments on interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal as he is elected leader, needs to campaign for LS polls: SC to ED

The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the Enforcement Directorate (ED) over the "delay" in its probe into the excise policy-linked money laundering case involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, and asked the agency to produce case files before the arrest of the AAP leader.

ADVERTISEMENT

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta also asked the ED to produce case files before and after the arrest of Delhi's former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, who is also an accused in the case.

The bench is hearing arguments on Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by the ED in the case.

It questioned the ED on the time taken to probe the case and noted that the agency has taken two years to unearth something The bench also asked why relevant direct questions were not put to witnesses and accused in the case. Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, appearing for the ED, said initially Kejriwal was not the focus of the investigation in the case and his role became clear at later stage.

He said Kejriwal had stayed in a seven-star hotel during the 2022 Goa Assembly polls and part of the bills were allegedly paid by the Delhi government's general administration department.

The bench was given a note by Raju in which he contradicted the submission of Kejriwal that the statements of approvers were suppressed by the probe agency.

The arguments in the matter are underway.

Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 and is currently lodged in Tihar Jail under judicial custody.

The top court had issued a notice to the ED on April 15 and sought its response to Kejriwal's plea against his arrest.

On April 9, the Delhi High Court had upheld Kejriwal's arrest, saying there was no illegality and the ED was left with "little option" after he skipped repeated summonses and refused to join the investigation.

The case relates to alleged corruption and money laundering in the formulation and execution of the Delhi government's now-scrapped excise policy for 2021-22.

Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by The Telegraph Online staff and has been published from a syndicated feed.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT