MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
Regular-article-logo Sunday, 17 November 2024

Delhi court rebukes CBI for not conducting psychological, lie detector tests on Asthana

The court has asked the initial investigating officer to appear before it on February 28

PTI New Delhi Published 19.02.20, 08:45 AM
Former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana (in picture) and DSP Devender Kumar were named in column 12 of the chargesheet in the case since there was not enough evidence to make them accused.

Former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana (in picture) and DSP Devender Kumar were named in column 12 of the chargesheet in the case since there was not enough evidence to make them accused. Telegraph File Picture

A Delhi court rapped the CBI on Wednesday for not conducting psychological and lie detector tests on its former special director Rakesh Asthana in a bribery case in which he was recently given a clean chit.

Special CBI judge Sanjeev Aggarwal directed Ajay Kumar Bassi, the initial investigating officer in the case, to appear before it on February 28 to explain the case diary.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court further said that advocate Sunil Mittal, a co-accused in the case, 'seems like a fictional character emerging from 'Mission Impossible' and 'James Bond' movies. Why showing so much indulgence to him?'

On Mittal's son-in-law Someshwar Prasad, the court asked, 'Why you are showing so much indulgence to someone who isn't cooperating and didn't even share his phone?'

The court had on last Wednesday expressed displeasure over CBI's investigation into the case and in a reference to Someshwar, it had asked why the accused with bigger roles were roaming free while the probe agency had arrested its own DSP.

Asthana and DSP Devender Kumar, who was arrested in 2018 and later got bail, were named in column 12 of the chargesheet in the case since there was not enough evidence to make them accused.

The CBI registered the case against Asthana on the basis of a complaint from Hyderabad-based businessman Satish Sana, facing probe in a 2017 case involving meat exporter Moin Qureshi.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT