MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Saturday, 05 October 2024

Hinduja-led IIHL cannot extinguish Esops of Reliance General Insurance Company

The legal opinion was necessitated as IIHL in its resolution plan for Reliance Capital has sought to extinguish all employees stock option plans, phantom stocks or similar incentive schemes of Reliance Capital and its subsidiaries, including RGIC, so that no additional cost is incurred after the takeover

PTI New Delhi Published 25.10.23, 10:35 AM
Representational image

Representational image File image

Hinduja-led IIHL — the successful bidder for Reliance Capital (RelCap) under insolvency proceedings — cannot extinguish the employees stock options (Esops) and other incentive schemes for the Reliance General Insurance Company (RGIC) employees, a subsidiary of Reliance Capital, according to legal opinion taken by Reliance General Insurance.

The legal opinion was necessitated as IIHL in its resolution plan for Reliance Capital has sought to extinguish all employees stock option plans, phantom stocks or similar incentive schemes of Reliance Capital and its subsidiaries, including RGIC, so that no additional cost is incurred after the takeover.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reliance General Insurance has issued Esops to its employees. Khaitan & Co in its legal opinion submitted to RGIC has opined that under IBC, treatment of assets and liabilities of subsidiary companies are not permitted to be prescribed under a resolution plan for the holding company.

The IBC recognises the principle of ‘separate legal entity’, which means that once incorporated, the company becomes a separate legal person and has a personality that is distinct from the person responsible for its constitution.

The legal firm was engaged by RGIC CEO Rakesh Jain.

The legal opinion, reviewed by PTI, states that since benefits in the form of the ESOPs, phantom stocks, other incentive schemes, statutory benefits such as gratuity, provident fund etc, form part of the liabilities of RGIC towards its employees, the same may not be dealt with or extinguished by IIHL in its resolution plan for Reliance Capital.

To support their opinion on the matter, Khaitan & Co has quoted several judgments of the Supreme Court and NCLT, which have held that even in a group company structure, both the holding and subsidiary companies continue to retain their status as separate legal entities, notwithstanding that a substantial part of the subsidiary’s capital is held by the holding company.

The Khaitan & Co has noted that the resolution plan submitted by the IIHL was under option-1, i.e., submission of resolution plan for Reliance Capital as a going concern.

Khaitan & Co quoting a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Vodafone International Holdings BV versus Union of India and others.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT